Episode 8 — Aptitude and Reasoning / 8.22 — Syllogism
8.22.b Tips, Tricks, and Shortcuts -- Syllogism
Tip 1: The Venn Diagram Method (Most Reliable)
Step-by-Step Process:
- Read all premises carefully.
- Identify the terms (A, B, C, etc.).
- Draw the Venn diagram for the first premise.
- Add the second premise to the SAME diagram.
- If multiple valid diagrams are possible, draw ALL of them.
- A conclusion is valid ONLY if it holds in ALL possible diagrams.
- If a conclusion fails in even ONE diagram, it is INVALID.
Drawing Rules:
"All A are B":
Draw A completely inside B.
+---------+
| B |
| +-----+ |
| | A | |
| +-----+ |
+---------+
"No A is B":
Draw A and B completely apart.
+-----+ +-----+
| A | | B |
+-----+ +-----+
"Some A are B":
Draw A and B overlapping.
+----+--+----+
| A |XX| B |
+----+--+----+
(XX = common area, at least one element exists here)
"Some A are not B":
Draw A with part outside B.
+------+---+----+
| A |XX | B |
+------+---+----+
(The left part of A is outside B -- at least one element here)
Tip 2: The "All-No" Chain Shortcut
When premises chain as All -> All -> All, or All -> No, you can directly derive:
All-All Chain:
All A are B + All B are C => All A are C
A --All--> B --All--> C
Result: A --All--> C
All-No Chain:
All A are B + No B is C => No A is C
A --All--> B --No--> C
Result: A --No--> C
Some-All Chain:
Some A are B + All B are C => Some A are C
A --Some--> B --All--> C
Result: A --Some--> C
Some-No Chain:
Some A are B + No B is C => Some A are not C
A --Some--> B --No--> C
Result: A --Some not--> C
INVALID Chains (No Conclusion):
Some A are B + Some B are C => NO definite conclusion
All A are B + Some B are C => NO definite conclusion about A and C
Some A are not B + (anything) => Usually NO definite conclusion
Tip 3: Quick Conclusion Validity Check
Shortcut Table:
For conclusions about A and C, given the relationship of A-B and B-C:
| A-B | B-C | A-C Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| All | All | All A are C |
| All | No | No A is C |
| All | Some | No definite conclusion |
| Some | All | Some A are C |
| Some | No | Some A are not C |
| Some | Some | No definite conclusion |
| No | All | Some C are not A (reverse only) |
| No | Some | No definite conclusion |
| Some-not | Any | No definite conclusion |
Memorize the valid chains: All+All, All+No, Some+All, Some+No.
Tip 4: The Either-Or Shortcut
When to use:
When you test two conclusions and BOTH individually fail, check if they form a complementary pair.
Complementary Pairs:
Pair 1: "Some A are B" (I) vs. "No A is B" (E)
Pair 2: "All A are B" (A) vs. "Some A are not B" (O)
Quick Check:
- Are the two conclusions about the SAME two terms (A and B)?
- Is one of Type I and the other Type E? OR one of Type A and the other Type O?
- If YES to both -> "Either ... or ..." follows.
Example:
Conclusions:
I. Some cats are dogs.
II. No cat is a dog.
Both fail individually? Yes.
Same terms (cats, dogs)? Yes.
I is Type I, II is Type E? Yes.
=> "Either I or II follows."
Tip 5: Handling "Possibility" Questions
Rule 1: If a conclusion is DEFINITELY true, its possibility is also true.
If "Some A are B" definitely follows -> "Some A are B is a possibility" is also TRUE.
Rule 2: A possibility is FALSE only if it contradicts the premises.
Premise: No A is B.
"Is it possible that Some A are B?" -> FALSE (direct contradiction)
"Is it possible that All A are B?" -> FALSE (contradicts No A is B)
Rule 3: For "Some" premises, many possibilities exist.
Premise: Some A are B.
Possible: All A are B? YES (valid diagram exists)
Possible: All B are A? YES (valid diagram exists)
Possible: No A is B? NO (contradicts the premise)
Tip 6: "Negative Conclusion" Shortcut
Rule: If one premise is negative, the conclusion (if valid) MUST be negative.
If premises include "No X is Y":
- Valid conclusions will be "No..." or "Some...not..."
- "All..." or "Some...are..." conclusions are usually INVALID.
Rule: Two negative premises give NO valid conclusion.
No A is B + No B is C => NO definite conclusion about A and C.
Tip 7: Reverse Conclusion Check
For every valid conclusion, check if its reverse is also valid:
| Conclusion | Reverse | Is Reverse Valid? |
|---|---|---|
| All A are B | All B are A | NOT necessarily |
| No A is B | No B is A | YES (always valid) |
| Some A are B | Some B are A | YES (always valid) |
| Some A are not B | Some B are not A | NOT necessarily |
Tip 8: The "At Least One" Trick
In banking exams, when the answer choices include:
(a) Only I follows
(b) Only II follows
(c) Either I or II follows
(d) Neither I nor II follows
(e) Both I and II follow
Strategy:
- Test I independently.
- Test II independently.
- If both follow -> (e)
- If only I -> (a), only II -> (b)
- If neither follows -> check for Either-Or -> (c)
- If neither and not complementary -> (d)
Tip 9: Multiple Diagram Testing
When "Some" appears in premises, there are multiple valid Venn diagrams. Test ALL:
For "Some A are B" + "Some B are C":
Diagram 1: All three partially overlap
+---+---+---+---+
| A | AB| BC| C |
+---+---+---+---+
Diagram 2: A and C overlap through B
+---+---+---+
| A |ABC| C |
+---+---+---+
Diagram 3: A and C are completely separate
+---+--+--+---+
| A |AB|BC| C |
+---+--+--+---+
(A and C don't share any region)
Since in Diagram 3, A and C are separate, "Some A are C" does NOT always hold. Since in Diagram 2, A and C overlap, "No A is C" does NOT always hold.
Result: No definite conclusion. Either-Or applies if the conclusions form a complementary pair.
Tip 10: Avoid These Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: "All A are B" does NOT mean "All B are A"
All cats are animals =/=> All animals are cats
Mistake 2: "Some A are not B" does NOT mean "Some B are not A"
Some students are not toppers =/=> Some toppers are not students
(If all toppers are students, the reverse fails!)
Mistake 3: Two particular premises give NO conclusion
Some A are B + Some B are C => NOTHING definite
Mistake 4: Two negative premises give NO conclusion
No A is B + No B is C => NOTHING definite about A and C
Mistake 5: Treating possibility as certainty
"Some A are B" makes "All A are B" POSSIBLE but NOT CERTAIN.
Tip 11: Speed Strategy for Exams
| Step | Time | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 sec | Read premises, identify types (A/E/I/O) |
| 2 | 15 sec | Draw Venn diagram(s) |
| 3 | 15 sec | Test each conclusion against diagram(s) |
| 4 | 10 sec | Check for Either-Or if needed |
| Total | ~50 sec | Per question |
Time-Saving Tips:
- If premises contain "All+All" or "All+No" -- directly apply the chain shortcut.
- If both premises are "Some" -- immediately know no definite conclusion (check Either-Or).
- Practice drawing Venn diagrams fast -- use simple circles.
Previous: 8.22.a Concepts and Formulas | Next: 8.22.c Solved Examples